PlayerLens

Built for Grassroots Football Coaches

Review players, track development and generate professional reports with academy-style tools designed specifically for grassroots football.

Built for Real Coaches

Team Insights

Identify common development priorities and receive session recommendations tailored to your squad.

Professional Player Reports

Generate detailed reports featuring radar charts, development commentary and clear coaching targets.

Track Progress Over Time

Compare up to four reviews to identify trends, strengths and key development priorities.

Manage Teams and Players with Ease

Create teams, add unlimited player profiles, and keep every review, coaching note and development record organised in one professional platform.

Professional Reports for Parents

Generate academy-style reports with radar charts, development commentary and clear next steps that can be securely shared with parents.

Identify Technical Standouts and Emerging Leaders

Automatically highlight players with exceptional technical ability, strong psychological traits and natural leadership potential.

Personalised Coaching Plans

Receive tailored coaching recommendations, session ideas and development priorities for every player based on their latest review.

Built for Real Coaching

PlayerLens combines professional analysis tools with practical grassroots coaching workflows.

⚽ Assess players using Four Corner Model
📊 Simple and intuitive 1–4 scoring system
📈 Compare 2, 3 or 4 reviews over time
📄 Generate professional parent reports
🔒 Secure share links for families
🎯 Individual coaching plans and targets
🧠 Technical standouts and leadership insights
🏃 Recommended playing positions
✏️ Edit and update past reviews
🗂️ Archive players and teams
👥 Manage multiple teams
🥅 Dedicated goalkeeper assessment framework
📋 Team-wide development recommendations
🔍 Session planning keywords for coaches

WHY A 1–4 SCORING SYSTEM?

Research in survey and performance-rating design consistently shows that respondents often gravitate toward the middle option when an odd-number scale is used. This is called central tendency bias.With a 1–5 scale:
- Many people default to 3 (“average” or “safe”)
- Ratings become less decisive
- Differences between players can be blurred
With a 1–4 scale:
- There is no neutral middle option
- Coaches must make a clearer judgement
- Data becomes more meaningful and actionable
PlayerLens Scale:
- Developing
- Emerging
- Strong
- OutstandingThis mirrors academy-style assessment by encouraging purposeful evaluation rather than “middle of the road” scoring.